Psychology for the most part is based upon the
above two dudes …
Sigmund
Freud (I will now refer to him as “Siggy”)
Now Siggy loved his penis / sometimes he hated his penis and
he thought all of your problems were a result of this issue as well … or maybe
how you felt about your mother growing up … did you secretly desire her …???...maybe
you did not spend enough time breast feeding or too much time on her breast as
an infant … Or how you felt about your shit (and this I mean literally)
… Siggy is the “man’s answer” to the “Vagina monologues” (no
wait Siggy could do both roles) … so take that cigar out of your mouth (it is
really a penis you know… wow do you have an oral fixation!) … hmmm which makes
me think about a “YouTube exorcist” … when asked by an audience member, how do you relax Father, after you have done
an exorcism, the priest replied … “I have a cigar and a glass of Bourbon”… OK … was he really just putting a cigar in
his mouth … what was his motivation to do this??? And not for nothing … what
“the hell” are you doing telling your audience you do something that causes
cancer and alcoholism… why that is something the devil would say!!!!
since I love to screw (OMG was that a Freudian slip!!!!) …
well anyhow since I love to screw with people’s minds … here goes … if I could,
I would use a time machine and drag
Siggy to 2019 and show him men (who identified as a women) and in the process
cut off their Johnson's and had breasts implanted onto their chest … then
show Siggy women who became physical men, for they identified as such, and they
cut off their breasts and use an artificial penis … WOW Siggy … how about that!
It would blow (OMG another Freudian slip) … it would blow Siggy’s mind … and he
would leap back into the past … where things were simpler for him … you either
have a penis or you have a vagina … no mixing and matching parts … poor Siggy
he would need a therapist!
But wait Siggy come back … I know where you can still practice
your kind of psychology in the hierarchy of the church and in some clergy …
they have really “Big penis issues”… or wait some might be small … don’t know
for that real estate is off limits for a woman in the Catholic church… but I believe
many of them share their “territory” with each other (if you know what I mean
Siggy) … So Siggy never forget you have a home in the Catholic Church hierarchy
…
Well on to Carl Jung … I kind of like this dude … he did not
have his hand down his pants with a cigar in his mouth, when he spoke of the
mysteries of the psyche (oh wait Siggy may I address you one more time … I saw online a priest talking about the “Biblical principles of masturbation”… dude …
Siggy I am telling you those guys are you kind of people ..)
Back to Jung … he is the dude who gave us … you know wait … I
will cut and paste a description of Jung … here goes …
Overview
Carl Jung understood archetypes as universal, archaic
patterns and images that derive from the collective unconscious and are the
psychic counterpart of instinct (got that my peeps… it is kind of simple to understand).
They are inherited
potentials which are actualized when they enter consciousness as images or
manifest in behavior on interaction with the outside world. OK I am thinking Jesus Christ and Jung are on the
same wave length … if you thought it you did it... (JC) … if you think it you
will manifest it (Jung)
They are autonomous and hidden forms which are
transformed once they enter consciousness and are given particular expression
by individuals and their cultures. In Jungian psychology, archetypes are highly developed elements of
the collective unconscious … The existence of archetypes can only be deduced
indirectly by using story, art, myths,
religions, or dreams.
WOW freak’n wow … that is where all “my stories come
from”… I am chuck full of archetypes within … Man … Jung would have a field day
with me… I would make him big money from all the sessions I would need! … let’s
see 3 to 4 hundred an hour going rate … Wow Jung could buy his own Lear jet
with me, (paid in cash) in just a few
years …
I do like Jung …he makes you think of things higher than
the flesh …
I am extremely fascinated by Jung’s Red Book … where he
forced interaction with his own subconscious…
Jung
went deep inside himself (which is what a mystic does) … at that level of
awareness there are no words … there are only images … imagines are faster and
cleaner than the spoken word … the old saying, a picture
is worth a thousand words is true … at deep levels of mysticism/ contemplation/
deep prayer the words are gone and you have only image … Jung did this within
himself by forcing his personality to get out of the way and he spoke to his
subconscious … but surprise … surprise his subconscious did not speak in words
but in image … hence Jung’s Red Book is filled with pictures of how “his inner
self / his deep subconscious spoke” …
which proves to me all mankind has the capacity to be a “mystic” it is within
us all …
But here is another interesting thought … I know someone who knew Padre Pio
personally … they were so close, she was given the “death veil” Padre Pio wore
in his casket (a fabric placed over the person face after death, Padre Pio had
one … ) … when asked in private … how he “bio- located”, what did it “feel
like”.. Padre Pio said this … when he bio-located he “extended his
personality”… Now some people would
say that is an OBE (out of body experience) … I tend to think Padre Pio was
doing what Carl Jung did … he forced his “personality / sub consciousness” to
separate and it became an “entity unto itself” … in common speak we all have a
“higher self” within … Carl Jung and Padre Pio were able to interact with their
higher selves on a profound level …
Ah but what makes me love Carl Jung the most is this …
Jung was for the most part favorable towards religion … he did not go all
negative on it …
but years ago, I
ran across a story about Jung in regards to Roman Catholicism … he felt if
there was one true religion it was Catholicism and he was extremely fascinated with … transubstantiation … Jung
was in awe with this concept that ordinary bread and wine would be changed into
the being of Jesus Christ (Jung believed it whole heartily … me too by the
way!!! ) … so one day Jung decided to invite a “holy Catholic Bishop” to his
home to hear all about how this was done on the altar !!! When Jung questioned
this Bishop … The Bishop seemed uninterested and not believing although this
Bishop was “labeled holy”… the Bishop had no interest in speaking about the
Eucharist to Jung … THIS CRUSHED Jung … he never spoke about it again … Dude
!!! Dude!!! Dude!!! I know your pain … I have the same thing going on in this
day and age, so called “holy Bishops” cannot verbalize or do not want to talk
about the Eucharist! I would love to have spoken to Carl Jung about the
Eucharist …
